By Ed Diokno
Views From The Edge
Privilege has its benefits as the trial accusing Harvard of anti-Asian bias revealed what was widely suspected: Harvard opens its gates wide if you’ve got a rich daddy.
The lawyers for Students for Fair Admissions—the anti-affirmative action group that filed the lawsuit contending that Harvard limits its Asian admissions—questioned Harvard’s Dean of Admissions and Financial Aid William R. Fitzsimmons this week about the admissions process at the elite Ivy League school.
One of the plaintiff’s attorneys, John M. Hughes, tried to show that Harvard favors the rich and well-connected by introducing some internal emails.
In 2013, the then dean of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government David T. Ellwood wrote Fitzsimmons an email stating he was “simply thrilled about all the folks you were able to admit,” according to The Washington Post. The email indicated that some of the admitted students were children of donors, calling them “superb additions to the class.”
LATEST STORIES
In 2014, Harvard tennis coach David Fish thanked Fitzsimmons via email for meeting with a prospective student whose family had apparently donated more than $1 million, writing, “We rolled out the red carpet.”
According to The New York Times, Hughes asked Fitzsimmons about the so-called “Dean’s Interest List” of students recommended by or related to rich donors. The recommended students received scores of 1 or 2, which indicated that they were to be given special consideration.
Fitzsimmons admitted in pre-trial testimony that greater “financial contribution[s]” can lead to higher ratings for individual applicants, reports The Harvard Crimson.
The dean defended Harvard’s special treatment of applicants with donor ties as “important for the long-term strength of the institution.” He noted the tactic helps to secure funding for scholarships, among other things.
Hughes continued to question Fitzsimmons about the 2013 report by the U.S. Dept. of Education that the school’s admissions process produces “negative effects” for Asian Americans. The report gave several recommendations to make its admissions process more transparent and fair.
Guided by the questions by Harvard’s attorney, Fitzsimmons gave more details about the school’s admissions procedure. He dove further into the details of Harvard’s admissions process, noting the school pursues three main objectives: “truly exceptional students,” “diversity of all types,” and “no more students than beds.”
The trial, which questions the use of race in evaluating applicants, is expected to last three weeks and, through appeals, will likely wind up in the U.S. Supreme Court and could impact affirmative action programs in education and employment.
AsAmNews has Asian America in its heart. We’re an all-volunteer effort of dedicated staff and interns. Check out our Twitter feed and Facebook page for more content. Please consider interning, joining our staff or submitting a story.