HomeAsian AmericansCourt upholds California's sanctuary laws
Don't Be Fooled by Gift Card Scams

Court upholds California’s sanctuary laws

Immigration Reform

Views from the Edge

The U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco agreed Thursday (April 18) with a Sacramento federal judge who ruled that California’s so-called sanctuary laws doesn’t conflict with federal immigration statutes.

The three-judge panel also upheld a California measure that requires private employers to alert workers before federal immigration inspections, while directing the lower-court judge to re-examine part of a third law that authorizes the state attorney general to inspect facilities that house immigrants not detained for criminal offenses.


The Ninth Circuit three-judge panel agreed with the lower court’s Judge John Mendez, in U.S. District Court in Sacramento, who denied a request by the federal Department of Justice for a preliminary injunction against California laws that limit cooperation with immigration enforcement officials. Judge Mendez ruled that the Trump administration failed to confront California’s primary concern: that total state cooperation with federal immigration enforcement would make Californians not more safe, but less. 

“The historic police powers of the State include the suppression of violent crime and preservation of community safety,” the judge adding that the “ebb of tensions between communities and the police underscores the delicate nature of this relationship. Even perceived collaboration with immigration enforcement could upset the balance California aims to achieve. The appeals court concluded that  Washington doesn’t have the constitutional power to require California’s assistance in immigration enforcement. SB 54, known as the California Values Act, bars local officials from informing federal officials about immigrants’ release dates from jail except in serious criminal cases. was signed into law by former then-Gov. Jerry Brown.

“SB 54 may well frustrate the federal government’s immigration enforcement efforts,” the court ruled. “However, whatever the wisdom of the underlying policy adopted by California, that frustration is permissible, because California has the right, pursuant to the anticommandeering rule, to refrain from assisting with federal efforts.” It is not known if the DOJ will appeal Mendez’ decision.

In a statement to NPR, Immigration and Customs Enforcement said the sanctuary state policy protects “criminal aliens.”

“To be clear, ICE neither expects nor wants, local law enforcement agencies to participate in immigration enforcement in the community; but as law enforcement officers, we do expect our partners to participate in protecting public safety,” ICE told NPR. California, with the country’s largest undocumented population and immigrant community has consistently challenged many of Trump’s immigration decrees with varying success. Trump has criticized California for not supporting his policies on illegal immigration. He  threatened just this week to send migrants caught crossing the southern border into the U.S. to so-called sanctuary cities — most of them Democratic strongholds — if they can no longer be legally detained.

AsAmNews has Asian America in its heart. We’re an all-volunteer effort of dedicated staff and interns. Check out our Twitter feed and Facebook page for more content. Please consider interning, joining our staff or submitting a story

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest

Worth the Time

Must Read

Regular Features

Latest

Discover more from AsAmNews

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading