By Ed Diokno
A lawsuit was filed challenging the constitutionality of Donald Trump’s Executive Order that calls for a temporary ban on the Muslim immigrants or refugees
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of more than 20 people challenging President Donald Trump‘s immigration ban on seven Muslim-majority countries as a First Amendment violation.
The Muslim civil rights advocates is calling Trump’s Executive Order the Muslim Exclusion Order, reminiscent of the Chinese Exclusion Act.The lawsuit charges that Trump’s executive order singles out one religion, which could lead to the expulsion of all Muslims living in the United States when their legal status expires.
A federal judge in Brooklyn issued the first injunction temporarily blocking implementation of part of the ban on Saturday. Judges in Virginia, Washington state, Texas and California followed suit.
The 27 plaintiffs contend that the Muslim exclusion order represents “the fulfillment of President Trump’s longstanding promise and boasted intent to enact a federal policy that overtly discriminates against Muslims and officially broadcasts a message that the federal government disfavors the religion of Islam, preferring all other religions instead.”
Filed in the U.S. District Court Eastern District of Virginia, the suit alleges the executive order violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which states the government cannot endorse one religion over another.
At huge #LAXprotest. @EricGarcetti, @MaxineWaters & I are fighting publicly and privately to get detainees reunited with their US families. pic.twitter.com/KhkAZM2O7R
— Ted Lieu (@tedlieu) January 29, 2017
“This policy is blatant xenophobia parading as national security. Numerous studies have shown that refugees and immigrants commit fewer crimes than native-born citizens., said Rep. Judy Chu. “Yet Mr. Trump continues to rely on the false justification that the U.S. cannot risk admitting refugees, when the reality is that the U.S. already has one of the strictest refugee vetting policies in the world.
“My responsibility is to ensure that the position of the Department of Justice is not only legally defensible, but is informed by our best view of what the law is after consideration of all the facts,” Yates said in a letter. “In addition, I am responsible for ensuring that the positions we take in court remain consistent with this institution’s solemn obligation to always seek justice and stand for what is right.”
History will look favorably on Sally Yates, who stood up for what she felt was right in opposition to the Trump administration’s #MuslimBan.
— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) January 31, 2017
Ed Diokno writes a blog :Views From The Edge: news and analysis from an Asian American perspective.
AsAmNews is an all-volunteer effort of dedicated staff and interns. You can show your support by liking our Facebook page at www.facebook.com/asamnews, following us on Twitter, sharing our stories, interning or joining our staff.